Site icon The Thrilling Detective Web Site

Lighten Up, Ray!

Directives from Chairman Chandler

“You know Chandler. Always griping about something.”
Chandler himself, in a letter to Edward Carter, 1950

Raymond Chandler was not a happy camper. In fact, he may have been about the crankiest writer who ever lived. He would have burned through the mumble-mouthed the murky, puff-headed cyber forest of discussion groups, blogs, web sites and X like Napalm.

Apparently never really that pleased with his own work, and prone to self-doubt, self-pity and self-loathing, he continually discussed, critiqued, defended, explained and picked viciously at his work. (He lamented that his novel, The Little Sister, was “nothing in it but style and dialogue and characters.”) and he was even harder on the rest of the world.

Yet, his landmark essay “The Simple Art of Murder,” first published in the December 1944 issue of The Atlantic Monthly,  wherein he outlined his definition of what a private detective should (or could) be, is, arguably, the most quoted and referenced piece of mystery criticism ever written. Here’s how he wraps it all up:

“In everything that can be called art there is a quality of redemption. It may be pure tragedy, if it is high tragedy, and it may be pity and irony, and it may be the raucous laughter of the strong man. But down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid. The detective in this kind of story must be such a man. He is the hero, he is everything. He must be a complete man and a common man and yet an unusual man. He must be, to use a rather weathered phrase, a man of honor — by instinct, by inevitability, without thought of it, and certainly without saying it. He must be the best man in his world and a good enough man for any world. I do not care much about his private life; he is neither a eunuch nor a satyr; I think he might seduce a duchess and I am quite sure he would not spoil a virgin; if he is a man of honor in one thing, he is that in all things.

He is a relatively poor man, or he would not be a detective at all. He is a common man or he could not go among common people. He has a sense of character, or he would not know his job. He will take no man’s money dishonestly and no man’s insolence without a due and dispassionate revenge. He is a lonely man and his pride is that you will treat him as a proud man or be very sorry you ever saw him. He talks as the man of his age talks — that is, with a rude wit, a lively sense of the grotesque, a disgust for sham, and a contempt for pettiness.

The story is this man’s adventure in search of a hidden truth, and it would be no adventure if it did not happen to a man fit for adventure. He has a range of awareness that startles you, but it belongs to him by right, because it belongs to the world he lives in. If there were enough like him, the world would be a very safe place to live in, without becoming too dull to be worth living in.”

He had things to say on other subjexts as well…

On classics…

On quality…

On best sellers…

On writing

On writers

On publishing

On Hollywood

On Dead Bodies

Secret Writing Tip…

Respectfully compiled by Kevin Burton Smith.

Exit mobile version