Site icon The Thrilling Detective Web Site

So it’s come to this…

The Film Geeks’ Top Ten P.I. Films (2012)

  

OKAY, it may be hard to believe, but the entire world does not revolve around private eyes…

Shocking, innit?

Some people, even people who profess to love mysteries and detective stories and all kinds of crime fiction, aren’t quite clear on exactly what defines a private eye, or in many cases even care.

That’s been proven to me time and time again, from some of the mail I’ve received over the years.

“Why don’t you have Charlie Chan on your site? Is it because he’s Asian? Are you racist?”

“Where’s Jessica Fletcher?”

“How come no James Bond?”

“Where’s Kojack?”

This was really brought home to me about a million or so years ago (2012) when was speaking with Gustavo Martinez and James R. Baker, two regulars at the Barnes & Noble in dead-end Palmdale where I used to work, and two unabashed and self-professed film geeks. (They were also annoyingly young, but I tried not to hold that against them).

Make no mistake — these two twenty-something dudes knew their stuff. James, a painter of the Post-abstract Expressionist school, and Gustavo, an aspiring filmmaker. Both of them could and would wax poetic about film theory and history like there was no tomorrow. These guys would get all excited over new Criterion releases, and speak fondly — and at impressive length — on the works of directors I’ve never even heard of. Hell, they would toss around words like “auteur” and “oeuvre” when they thought nobody was listening (It was Palmdale, after all).

But I digress.

So, anyway, it was a dead Sunday night, I was bored out of my skull in the music and movie department at the back of the store, and so I strolled over to them, as usual prowling through the Criterion and foreign film sections. We shot the shit for a while about genre and sub-genre, and whether Jerry Lewis was really worthy of attention, when I put it to them: “What are your favourite private eye flicks?”

I figured I’d either get a rerun of all the usual suspects, or — even better — an edgy, avant-garde list of art house obscurities I’d never even heard of.

But I was shocked — I tell you, shocked — at the completely blank looks I received. They couldn’t think of one single PI flick off the tops of their heads.

This can’t be, I thought. I tried prompting them.

“The Maltese Falcon?”

“Haven’t seen it.”

“Out of the Past”?

“Nope.”

“Chinatown?”

“Polanksi, right?”

“Uh, yeah.”

“Never saw it.”

And finally, they asked, “Well, what’s a private eye, exactly?”

I explained, as best I could, trying to convey the nuances of a sub-genre they’d never really considered. To their credit, they got it. And they started tentatively naming names. Parasite that I am, I asked them to compile a Top Ten list for this site.

They disappeared for a while, vanishing into wherever it is that twenty-somethings went back then, and eventually, much to my surprise, they both e-mailed me their lists and the next few weeks. And in true auteur theory, they made a point of listing the directors.

The results were sort of disheartening, on the one hand. Most of the films they chose were, in one way or another, relative recent spoofs and parodies, self-conscious, ironic post-Modern re-imaginings of the Shamus Game, in many cases reducing the trope of the private eye film to easy targets rich for satire, and some of them are only tangentially private eye films at all.

But the list is also, on the other hand, sort of revealing and undeniably sort of fun. I hope they had fun doing it; I hope you have fun reading it.

And I wonder where Gustavo and James are right now…

• • • • •

GUSTAVO’S LIST

“I decided to pick contemporary and modern films as opposed to the traditional.”
— Gustavo

JAMES’S LIST

List respectfully compiled and loosely edited by Kevin Burton Smith. James and Gustavo have spoken…

Exit mobile version