John Sugar (Sugar)

Created by Mark Protosevich


 “I don’t like hurting people.”

What the fuck was this?

When I caught the first episode of Sugar, an eight-parter that streamed on Apple TV+ in the spring of 2024, it felt like a dream come true.

A smart, stylish (and parody-free) private eye drama? Aimed at adults? Suitably complex, well-acted, cleverly plotted?

I had high hopes. Both the Girl Detective and I were impressed. That  beautiful opening sequence– LA street scenes rendered in brooding, vaguely noirish pastel brushstrokes, seemed to suggest that, “Yes, this was a private eye story and yes, we know we’re playing with long-established clichés and tropes, but sit back and enjoy. We know what we’re doing.”

I was more than ready. I fell for it.

Colin Farrell was perfect as JOHN SUGAR, a highly-paid, buttoned-down, impeccably dressed Los Angeles private eye with more than a few secrets (of course), who tools around town in a classic set of wheels–in this case, an immaculate “Nassau blue” 1966 Corvette convertible. He’s a man of the world, with expensive tastes in cars and clothes, a multilingual film buff with copies of Cahier du cinema and American Cinematographer scattered around his apartment, justifying the rather cool juxtaposition of film clips from old crime and detective films sliced into the narrative, a sort of meta Greek chorus, which I took to be a knowing wink for fans of the genre. 

After wrapping up an assignment in Tokyo, Sugar returns to Los Angeles, and is hired to find a legendary Hollywood producer’s beloved granddaughter, Olivia Siegel, an ex-junkie with a host of personal problems.

So far, so good. A classic private eye story, as Sugar works the means streets, bouncing from dive bars to the mansions of glory, interviewing an engaging cast of odd ball characters, from skanky perverts, washed-up rockers and brutish thugs to pampered actors and Hollywood royalty. Ego? Ambition? Greed? Violence? Psychosis? They’re all here, brought to life by a truly impressive cast (Amy Ryan, James Cromwell, Nate Corddry, Alex Hernandez, Anna Gunn, etc.). And so Sugar works the case, repeatedly claiming he doesn’t want to hurt people although it’s soon revealed that he’s rather good at it when pushed,  gradually digging up far more secrets than the Siegel family really wants exposed.

The tone is just so right, with occasional voice-over narration by Sugar; a broody, moody jazz score warbling in the background, and those black-and-white flashes of classic noir scenes. And there was no padding. Everything seemed tight and right, with most episodes hovering around the thirty-minute mark. It was good. 

Oh, yes, there were flaws, and a few off-putting moments. Sugar catches an annoying house fly in his chopsticks? His over-the-top, schmaltzy bonding with a strange dog? His boasting that he can drink all night without getting drunk?

I just assumed these were overly enthusiastic drops of love from a writer, creator Mark Protosevich, who I figured must really love the P.I. genre.

But I was wrong. The familiarity with the Shamus Game, it turns out, was not so much droplets of affection as a bucketful of cynical contempt. Or possibly unchecked pretension.

Or were they simply “clues” to “The Big Twist”?

Turns out that spineroo at the butt end of episode six is one of the stupidest “Jump the Shark” moments in television history. It’s the narrative equivalent of Sam Spade, three quarters of the way through The Maltese Falcon, being bitten by a radioactive spider, and having to battle Doc Oak.

The contempt for the audience is palpable; a pointless plot twist that serves no purpose other than to enrage rather than engage faithful viewers, or maybe to trumpet the writer’s rule-busting “cleverness” and general disdain for a genre he’s used to sell six episodes of an eight-part series.

And those final two episodes? Flimsy excuses for resolution that don’t so much wrap things up as spit in the face of the audience, as the final clues seemingly fall into Sugar’s lap. What happened to detective work?

But it all harks back to that Big Twist. It’s so fucking stupid I suggest you watch the first five episodes and all of the sixth episode, minus the last five minutes, and then close your eyes and imagine your own ending.

It’s gotta be better than the shit sandwich Sugar serves up.

UNDER OATH

  • “A stylishly engaging and crisp neo-noir steeped in the hardboiled detective tradition, Apple TV+’s Sugar… is rather terrific—that is, until it’s not… while it’s super strong for about six of its eight episodes, its genre-bending twist is unfortunate and kind of ruins the series. We won’t spoil it here, but it’s a bold choice that ultimately doesn’t work, upending the entire series and adding a new element that feels far-fetched and one step too far.”
    — ABC Entertainment
  • “If you aren’t already enamored with the show, (the) twist will have you on the edge of your seat, for better or worse.”
    — Kaiya Shunyata (Rogerebert.com)
  • Sugar enraptures its audience through a solid mystery, genuine characters and phenomenal acting that all build to what should be a completely unexpected and powerful conclusion to end this wonderfully crafted season. The ending we are given, however, is one that leaves the audience disappointed… It’s hard to not judge the show entirely based on the last two episodes, as it derails the plot in a way that is detrimental to the integrity of the series and honestly seems like a hard and unnatural reach for a second season.”
    — Hayley Cooke (Loud and Clear Reviews)

TELEVISION

  • SUGAR
    (2024, Apple TV+)
    Eight episodes
    Premiere: April 5, 2024
    Created by Mark Protosevich
    Written by Mark Protosevich, Donald Joh, Sam Catlin, David Rosen
    Directors: Fernando Meirelles, Adam Arkin
    Starring Colin Farrell as JOHN SUGAR
    Kirby as Ruby
    and Amy Ryan as Melanie
    Also starring Dennis Boutsikaris, Nate Corddry, Alex Hernandez, James Cromwell, Anna Gunn, Massi Furlan, Eric Lange, Sydney Chandle, Bernardo Badillo, Miguel Sandoval, Jason Butler Harner, Elizabeth Anweis, Don DiPetta, Joey Pollari, Jennifer Marshall, Paul Schulze, Paula Andrea Placido, Darwin Shaw, Jon Beavers

FURTHER INVESTIGATION

Respectfully submitted by Kevin Burton Smith.

 

3 thoughts on “John Sugar (Sugar)

  1. The problem is, the modern millennial/Gen creative narcissistically believes he or she can always upend or subvert and therefore improve a time-honored genre they scarcely understand or appreciate in the first place.
    Rian Johnson’s Benoit Blanc and Charlie Cale arose from and play fascinating riffs on the classic whodunit BECAUSE Johnson is steeped in a personal love for the mystery — so much so he was willing to pass on the droning, interminable, high-profit Star Wars cereal factory. His innovations involve tapping contemporary social mores (Knives), incorporating 21st Century characters and motivations (I still hold that what many see as the greatest flaw in Glass Onion was actually what makes it stunningly brilliant in the context of a Musk or Bezos), or modern blue-collar/rural/forgotten milieus (Poker Face). Brick put a new riff on the PI subgenre without descending to parody or abruptly jamming some contrived “personal creative vision.” You kinda suspect they actually hate the genre, that their attempt is to destroy rather than subvert.
    Affection and mastery were what made Rockford, Harry O, and Stumptown great series (curse you, ABC) and Kalinda and Good Fight’s Jay diPersia standouts in the Kings’ legal saga. Even a non-genre series like Alaska Daily captured the gruntwork and thrill of PI-style investigative pursuit. I appreciate Tracker as at least true to meat-and-potatoes form and substance and a satisfying hour of viewing, but its focus on action and easily-digestible, linear emotions rather than exceptional investigative acumen or character/plot complexity reflects not only the CBS core audience but the larger U.S. TV audience. In my view, Netflix’ Mick Haller and FreeVee’s Bosch sequel offer the purest current fix for the PI aficionado. High Desert could have been so much more with (God help me) more Brad Garrett and less creative self-indulgence.

Leave a Reply